Re: Bug?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Indira Muthuswamy <indumuthu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug?
Date: 2006-10-18 13:31:54
Message-ID: 45362CCA.8060000@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

Indira Muthuswamy wrote:
> Hai,
>
> I have encountered a problem with PostgreSQL.I have created a table
> 'tab1' with a column 'a' with serial type.I entered 20 records into
> the table.So the query
> select max(a) from tab1;
> returned 20.When I tried the same query after the command
> truncate table tab1;
> I found that the output of the first query as
>
> max
> -----
>
> (1 row)
>
> When I tried to insert a new row into the table tab1 I found that the
> value at column a incremented to the value 21.
> But I heard from my friends that the value of the serial column gets
> decremented whenever we issue the 'truncate table' command (in MS SQL
> SERVER).Is the concept same with PostgreSQL or not?Can anyone clarify
> me on this?
>

Sure. You heard wrong about postgres.

Please do not ask questions like this on the -hackers list - this should
have gone to pgsql-general. The hackers list is for postgresql
development discussions only.

cheers

andrew

In response to

  • Bug? at 2006-10-18 13:23:46 from Indira Muthuswamy

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2006-10-18 13:44:05 Re: bug or feature, || -operator and NULLs
Previous Message Indira Muthuswamy 2006-10-18 13:23:46 Bug?

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy 2006-10-18 13:49:32 plpgsql record as parameter ???
Previous Message Indira Muthuswamy 2006-10-18 13:23:46 Bug?