Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Chris Mair <chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org>
Cc: alexei(dot)vladishev(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Date: 2006-10-14 18:28:12
Message-ID: 45312C3C.9020108@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


> I'd dare to say that if you just ran ZABBIX on 8.1 with
> autovacuum on with a shortish interval (30 sec?) you'd
> get rid of your performance problems. Time to update
> the documentation after all? ;)

I would be curious to see what would happen if you added to vacuum_*
parameters to the equation (such as the delay).

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Bye,
> Chris.
>
>
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-14 18:35:12 BEGIN WORK READ ONLY;
Previous Message Chris Mair 2006-10-14 18:23:53 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-14 18:55:03 Re: [PATCHES] New shared memory hooks proposal (was Re: pre_load_libraries)
Previous Message Chris Mair 2006-10-14 18:23:53 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD