Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> writes:
>> If someone's going to commit to putting effort into improving the
>> planner then that's wonderful. But I can't recall any significant
>> planner improvements since min/max (which I'd argue was more of a bug
>> fix than an improvement).
>
> Hmph. Apparently I've wasted most of the last five years.
>
In my opinion your on-going well thought out planner improvements are
*exactly* the approach we need to keep doing...
Cheers
Mark