Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types
Date: 2006-10-06 12:40:53
Message-ID: 45264ED5.10704@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Richard Huxton wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why pg_dump can't do the --list/--use-list flags
> like pg_restore, or is it just a matter of round tuits?
>

The major reason for having those features as I understand it was to
help overcome dependency difficulties in dumps, which are now largely a
thing of the past.

However, ISTM that a similar facility for fine grained control could
fairly easily be built into pg_dump.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-10-06 13:39:04 Re: Another idea for dealing with cmin/cmax
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2006-10-06 11:21:27 Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types