Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Date: 2006-10-03 20:31:20
Message-ID: 4522C898.7050207@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>> Also should installation.sgml
>> mention the issueswith building 32 vs 64 bit binaries
>
> I'm not convinced there is an issue. dtrace will build the right
> binaries by default. If you're messing with mixed environments *and*
> delve into dtrace, you should probably be able to figure this out
> yourself.
>
>> and/or the issue with static functions?
>
> The issue with that is simply that there is no released operating system
> version for which the dtrace support works. I'm not sure what to do
> about that.
>

Peter, dtrace is part of Solaris 10 as well. Latest version of
opensolaris does not have this problem, but Solaris 10 will solve this
in the update 3.

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-03 20:36:13 Re: MSVC build broken (again)
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-03 20:13:20 Re: MSVC build broken (again)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-03 20:36:13 Re: MSVC build broken (again)
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-03 20:13:20 Re: MSVC build broken (again)