Re: On future conferences

From: mdean <mdean(at)xn1(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Andy Astor <andya(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "'Joshua D(dot) Drake'" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "'Andrew Sullivan'" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, "'Robert Bernier'" <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On future conferences
Date: 2006-09-30 13:23:02
Message-ID: 451E6FB5.2070002@xn1.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andy Astor wrote:
>
>> ...and EnterpriseDB.
>>
>
> What isn't clear is whether EnterpriseDB offers straight PostgreSQL
> training, rather than EnterpriseDB product training.
>
>
I see only expensive courses in North Carolina, Ottawa, and Swizerland.
The Enterprisedb site does not mention training. Postgresql vendors
need to adopt the SAS model and offer lower priced courses in many more
cities, such as in San Francisco, Oakland, Des Moines, etc. or let
users kill two birds with one stone and take courses AND certification
at major conferences, like linux is doing with Linuxworld. We all know
the Pervasive model for "support" does not work, I would question how
popular these training courses are either. Personally my company would
not pay 3-5 grand plus travel costs for one week courses. So like the
conferences, the courses relate only to elitest elements, and offer
nothing for the masses, which are good reasons why postgresql is NOT
used by the masses. After over a full year in reviewing the operations
of the postgresql community, I sense a strong elitest mentality and an
unwillingness to define and take care of customers. A formula for failure.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-09-30 15:12:30 Re: On future conferences
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-30 03:29:00 Re: On future conferences