| From: | Bo Lorentsen <bl(at)netgroup(dot)dk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication and PITR |
| Date: | 2006-09-29 05:37:10 |
| Message-ID: | 451CB106.10105@netgroup.dk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jim Nasby wrote:
> You can work around it right now, too; you just need an external
> process that will find the active WAL file and periodically copy it to
> the backup. I'm pretty sure there's info in the archives about the
> details of setting this up, and there's also the PITRHA project on
> pgFoundry.
I have seen the PITRHA project, but it looked a bit to much like a hack
to me. By doing to much hacking I just end up locking me into a fixed PG
version, and that I don't like the sound of.
/BL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bo Lorentsen | 2006-09-29 05:48:41 | Re: Replication and PITR |
| Previous Message | Damian C | 2006-09-29 05:29:18 | Do non-sequential primary keys slow performance significantly?? |