| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Match(dot)Grun(at)thomson(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved) |
| Date: | 2006-09-26 17:06:04 |
| Message-ID: | 45195DFC.3030907@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek,
>> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>>> But the question is if the "-fast" flag is good for postgres. The
>>> -fast flag sets "brutal" floating point optimization and some
>>> operation should have less precision. Is possible verify that
>>> floating point operation works well?
>>
>> That's a pretty good way to guarantee that you'll break the datetime
>> code.
>>
>> It might be acceptable if you use --enable-integer-datetimes.
>
> I suggest to remove mention about -fast flag from FAQ.Solaris or add
> warning about usage of this.
>
> Josh do you have any cc flags suggestion?
Using Sun Studio? I'm hardly the expert. Maybe Jignesh?
--Josh Berkus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeanna Geier | 2006-09-26 17:12:55 | Re: pg_hba.conf: 'trust' vs. 'md5' Issues |
| Previous Message | Jeff Frost | 2006-09-26 16:56:13 | Re: pg_hba.conf: 'trust' vs. 'md5' Issues |