Re: Postgresql 8.0 beta 1 - strange cpu usage statistics and slow vacuuming

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0 beta 1 - strange cpu usage statistics and slow vacuuming
Date: 2004-08-24 16:11:00
Message-ID: 4518.1093363860@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers-win32

Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Sounds reasonable. However, I don't see the same
> performance hit while doing bulk database operations
> (ie: inserts, deletes, updates). Is that expected
> behavior? Do vacuum operations fsync()/_commit() more
> often?

IIRC, vacuum fsyncs once per table (possibly more depending on whether
you add FULL, ANALYZE, etc). Not clear what case you are considering
exactly.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-08-24 16:13:59 Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs =
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2004-08-24 16:10:44 Re: Is it possible...

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-08-24 17:09:17 Re: postmaster.pid
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2004-08-24 16:06:49 Re: postmaster.pid