Re: Cause of moving-target FSM space-needed reports

From: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cause of moving-target FSM space-needed reports
Date: 2006-09-21 18:44:25
Message-ID: 4512DD89.2090404@logix-tt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, Tom,

Tom Lane wrote:

> I think it's reasonable for vacuumlazy.c to track at most MaxFSMPages
> pages as it's doing now --- but it should keep a separate count of the
> total number of pages with at least threshold amount of free space, and
> pass that as a separate argument to RecordRelationFreeSpace. This will
> not take any more space in shared memory than we already use, but it
> will allow us to report a truthful value for "number of pages needed",
> which we clearly are failing to do now.
>
> It might also be a good idea if vacuum verbose reported this page count,
> since when you've got a single table bloated like this, VACUUM FULL or
> CLUSTER might be a more appropriate solution than increasing the FSM
> size --- but there's no way to know which rel is the problem from the
> FSM total. In fact, maybe vacuum should just throw a WARNING when it
> finds a single rel with more than MaxFSMPages pages with useful free space?

+1 for both from my side, it has bitten me and our admins several times now.

Thanks,
Markus

--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-21 19:44:46 Re: Cause of moving-target FSM space-needed reports
Previous Message Markus Schaber 2006-09-21 18:39:28 Re: Index bloat problem in 7.4