Re: minor feature request: Secure defaults during

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pascal Meunier <pmeunier(at)cerias(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: minor feature request: Secure defaults during
Date: 2006-09-18 22:55:38
Message-ID: 450F23EA.2090109@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> This pg_dump issue keeps biting us in the rear... I think at the very
> least we should have a means for a dump file to tell the backend that
> it's about to process a dump file generated by version XYZ. That at
> least gives us the ability to handle prior version incompatibilites.
>

Jim,

please review the long, not to say drawn out, discussion on this point
from a year or two back.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-18 23:07:29 Re: An Idea for OID conflicts
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-18 22:47:02 Re: Release notes