Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Status of

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Status of
Date: 2006-09-15 19:56:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
> It's not a turf battle - it's about the fact that a number of years ago,
> it was agreed that we would consolidate and merge all the subsites that
> had sprung up whereever reasonable to do so. That's why advocacy went,
> why developer went, why odbc went,

?? jumps to pgfoundry.

Then there is:


> going. Anyone who has worked hard towards that aim, or just agreed with
> the strategy is naturally going to want some seriously good
> justification to backtrack and create another new site in the
> domain.
> Regards, Dave.


You are on the funds group. You know the stuff we will be keeping track 
of and the discussions we will be having. Why is this even a problem? 
Why is this even a discussion?

Joshua D. Drake


    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2006-09-15 20:06:43
Subject: Re: Status of
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2006-09-15 19:49:52
Subject: Re: Status of

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group