Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?
Date: 2006-09-15 19:56:01
Message-ID: 450B0551.3070701@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


> It's not a turf battle - it's about the fact that a number of years ago,
> it was agreed that we would consolidate and merge all the subsites that
> had sprung up whereever reasonable to do so. That's why advocacy went,
> why developer went, why odbc went,

?? odbc.postgresql.org jumps to pgfoundry.

Then there is:

pgadmin
jdbc
pmt
jabber
archives
search

> going. Anyone who has worked hard towards that aim, or just agreed with
> the strategy is naturally going to want some seriously good
> justification to backtrack and create another new site in the
> postgresql.org domain.
>
> Regards, Dave.

Dave,

You are on the funds group. You know the stuff we will be keeping track
of and the discussions we will be having. Why is this even a problem?
Why is this even a discussion?

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-09-15 20:06:43 Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-09-15 19:49:52 Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?