From: | Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lock partitions |
Date: | 2006-09-14 18:47:15 |
Message-ID: | 4509A3B3.8030200@osdl.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> This is a server-side failure --- could we see how order_status()
>>> is defined? What PG version are you testing exactly?
>
>> I took pgsqsl snapshot from cvs on Sept 11. Due to the length of the
>> file that order_status() is in and of order_status() itself, here's is a
>> url for the file in the svn repository. order_status() is defined
>> starting on line 710:
>
>> http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/osdldbt/trunk/dbt2/storedproc/pgsql/c/funcs.c?view=markup
>
> Hmph. I think we broke something --- the error implies that some
> function tried to return a tuple that hadn't been properly "blessed",
> but I can't see that order_status or any of the other functions in that
> file are doing anything wrong. In any case, if it used to work for you,
> we had better figure out exactly why it stopped working.
>
> I know you've posted info before on how to set up and run the dbt code,
> but could you refresh my memory? Is there a URL somewhere with the info?
Here's a readme:
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/osdldbt/trunk/dbt2/README-POSTGRESQL?view=markup
But perhaps something much easier, using subversion:
mkdir /mnt/dbt2 # for pgdata
svn co https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/osdldbt/trunk/dbt2 dbt2
cd dbt2
./configure --with-postgresql=<pgsql_dir>
make
cd scripts/pgsql/
./build_db -g -w 1
cd ..
./run_workload -w 1 -d 120 -c 20 -n
I think that should work. That will create a 1 warehouse database and
run a 120 second test with no-thinktimes. That should be sufficient to
run through each transaction more than several times.
Thanks,
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-14 19:03:52 | Re: Lock partitions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-14 18:34:51 | Re: Lock partitions |