From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Mid cycle release? |
Date: | 2006-09-14 16:53:40 |
Message-ID: | 45098914.2010900@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>> In addition to that this plan might hold back some people from upgrading
>>> to 8.2 which solves quite a few critical issues with features we
>>> marketed/introduced during the past 8.x cycles and are really getting
>>> polished and usable now (partitioning,pitr,...) and 8.2 gives quite a
>>> nice performance boost for a lot of workloads too.
>>>
>> I frankly won't see many people migrate to 8.2. Most of my customers
>> will wait for 8.3 anyway. (except new business of course).
>
> I disagree - 8.2 is much more attractive for us then say 8.0 or 8.1 was
> and we will probably adopt it rather aggressively ...
That's why I said "I frankly won't". I have customers with multi
terrabyte datasets. 8.1 performs wonderfully for them. It would be a
hard push to initiate an 8.2 outage for that.
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-09-14 17:03:44 | Re: Draft release notes |
Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-09-14 16:49:07 | Re: Mid cycle release? |