Re: Mid cycle release?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mid cycle release?
Date: 2006-09-14 16:53:40
Message-ID: 45098914.2010900@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>>> In addition to that this plan might hold back some people from upgrading
>>> to 8.2 which solves quite a few critical issues with features we
>>> marketed/introduced during the past 8.x cycles and are really getting
>>> polished and usable now (partitioning,pitr,...) and 8.2 gives quite a
>>> nice performance boost for a lot of workloads too.
>>>
>> I frankly won't see many people migrate to 8.2. Most of my customers
>> will wait for 8.3 anyway. (except new business of course).
>
> I disagree - 8.2 is much more attractive for us then say 8.0 or 8.1 was
> and we will probably adopt it rather aggressively ...

That's why I said "I frankly won't". I have customers with multi
terrabyte datasets. 8.1 performs wonderfully for them. It would be a
hard push to initiate an 8.2 outage for that.

Joshua D. Drake

>
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2006-09-14 17:03:44 Re: Draft release notes
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2006-09-14 16:49:07 Re: Mid cycle release?