Re: Poor performance on seq scan

From: Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)fer(dot)hr>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Poor performance on seq scan
Date: 2006-09-13 21:02:01
Message-ID: 450871C9.1010709@fer.hr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote:

> This board has Intel chipset. I cannot remember the exact type but it
> was not in the low end category.
> dmesg says:
>
> <Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller>
> kernel: ad4: 152626MB <SAMSUNG HD160JJ ZM100-33> at ata2-master SATA150
> kernel: ad4: 152627MB <SAMSUNG HD160JJ ZM100-33> at ata3-master SATA150

There have been reported problems with ICH7 on FreeBSD mailing lists,
though I can't find any that affect performance.

> Components: 2
> Balance: round-robin
> Slice: 4096

See if changing balance algorithm to "split", and slice size to 8192 or
more, while keeping vfs.read_max to 16 or more helps your performance.

(e.g. gmirror configure -b split -s 8192 gm0)

Also, how is your file system mounted? (what does output from 'mount' say?)

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-13 21:09:44 Re: Performance With Joins on Large Tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-13 20:51:53 Re: sql-bench