From: | Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)fer(dot)hr> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Poor performance on seq scan |
Date: | 2006-09-13 21:02:01 |
Message-ID: | 450871C9.1010709@fer.hr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote:
> This board has Intel chipset. I cannot remember the exact type but it
> was not in the low end category.
> dmesg says:
>
> <Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller>
> kernel: ad4: 152626MB <SAMSUNG HD160JJ ZM100-33> at ata2-master SATA150
> kernel: ad4: 152627MB <SAMSUNG HD160JJ ZM100-33> at ata3-master SATA150
There have been reported problems with ICH7 on FreeBSD mailing lists,
though I can't find any that affect performance.
> Components: 2
> Balance: round-robin
> Slice: 4096
See if changing balance algorithm to "split", and slice size to 8192 or
more, while keeping vfs.read_max to 16 or more helps your performance.
(e.g. gmirror configure -b split -s 8192 gm0)
Also, how is your file system mounted? (what does output from 'mount' say?)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-13 21:09:44 | Re: Performance With Joins on Large Tables |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-13 20:51:53 | Re: sql-bench |