Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server

From: Dmitry Yurichev <dsy(dot)075(at)yandex(dot)ru>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Ivan Bykov <i(dot)bykov(at)modernsys(dot)ru>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server
Date: 2025-12-03 14:19:37
Message-ID: 44c57543-a9a8-40fb-98a4-ca68ce50cd7e@yandex.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/2/25 16:48, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Thanks! Agreed, v14-16 were the same. v17 and v18 might be worth testing
> separately, to make sure I didn't e.g. screw up the locking differences.

I tested on the REL_18_1 tag (with applying
v15-pg18-0001-Set-next-multixid-s-offset-when-creating-a-.patch).
I didn't notice any deadlocks or other errors. Thanks!

--
Best regards,
Dmitry Yurichev.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-12-03 14:27:20 Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-12-03 14:15:00 Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?