Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...
Date: 2006-09-05 16:43:28
Message-ID: 44FDA930.9060105@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> Checking my copy of the "hit list", I thought we'd agreed to migrate
> contrib/oracle as well.

Hmmm ... somehow that got dropped out of discussions early on, without
any reason why. See the "more nuclear options" thread; oracle is
nowhere on it.

Will only take me 30 min to migrate, but we need to give people time to
object ... and I need to check whether there's even any code in there
that superceded orasysviews and orafce and oralink.

Hey, everyone, if you have a reason for contrib/oracle not to migrate
out to pgFoundry, speak up now!

Or if you want to take the new project over, speak up too.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-05 16:48:34 Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-09-05 16:40:16 Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...