Re: [HACKERS] Interval month, week -> day

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interval month, week -> day
Date: 2006-09-04 01:42:45
Message-ID: 44FB8495.6080705@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> You mentioned being unable to get the ecpg tests to run on your
> machine. I'm sure Michael and Joachim would like the details. The
> ecpg regression tests are pretty new and some portability problems
> are to be expected, but they seem to be passing on all the machines
> Michael and Joachim and I have access to.
>
>
>

I have just today released a new version of the buildfarm client that
includes ECPG regression testing for HEAD (until now that was in our CVS
tip but not in a released version).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2006-09-04 01:52:18 Re: BUG #2600: dblink compile with SSL missing
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2006-09-04 01:39:18 Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2006-09-04 01:52:18 Re: BUG #2600: dblink compile with SSL missing
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2006-09-04 01:39:18 Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes