| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project |
| Date: | 2006-09-03 01:11:51 |
| Message-ID: | 44FA2BD7.6040208@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
>> There are a number of reasons for this, not least of which is the
>> enormous and ever-changing requirements such a system would have to
>> have.
>>
>
>
>> The buildfarm is an excellent example of this.
>>
>
> The build farm is not an example of this. There isn't any build-farm
> software out there. There is, however, plenty of issue tracking
> software out there.
>
> Just pointing that out. Have at it. I for one would rather set up
> existing issue trackers and work with them. If I could just find
> hardware to host it. Not that I've looked, though.
>
>
What is more, a good bug tracking system is orders of magnitude more
complex that the buildfarm.
If we want something sooner rather than later, let's use something off
the shelf and tailor it.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-03 01:16:21 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change FETCH/MOVE to use int8. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-03 00:56:33 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change FETCH/MOVE to use int8. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-09-03 01:54:02 | Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-09-02 23:51:09 | Re: [HACKERS] gBorg status? |