Re: GIN FailedAssertions on Itanium2 with Intel compiler

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: GIN FailedAssertions on Itanium2 with Intel compiler
Date: 2006-09-01 11:48:40
Message-ID: 44F81E18.7090909@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> What does that option do? Is it practical to enable it for the entire
> backend?
From docs:
Disables inline expansion of standard library or intrinsic functions.

> And isn't this a straightforward compiler bug they should be notified
> about?
What's a choice? Now I see 3:
1) -O1
2) "volatile"
3) -nolib_inline

IMHO, only -O1 is guarantee for other possible places... But I'm not familiar
enough with such kinds of bugs.

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-09-01 11:49:07 Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-09-01 11:39:19 Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure