Re: database contest results

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: mdean <mdean(at)xn1(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
Subject: Re: database contest results
Date: 2006-08-30 02:48:58
Message-ID: 44F4FC9A.1040106@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

mdean wrote:
> Jeff Davis wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 00:10 +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Guys, what I need is alternative benchmark data, where postgresql comes
> out better on standard assumptions, etc. than i this example Can this
> be done?

Sure, run dbt2 or dbt3 or dbt4

> Michael
>
>
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2006-08-30 03:44:54 Re: database contest results
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-08-30 02:34:36 Re: database contest results