Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> My objection here is basically that this proposal passed on the
>>> assumption that it would be very nearly zero effort to make it happen.
>> Kicking out autovacuum as default is a disaster, it took far too long to
>> get in the backend already (wasn't it planned for 8.0?).
> If it's so "disastrous" to not have it, why wasn't it even proposed
> until two weeks after feature freeze?
To me, this proposal was just too obvious, for reasons already discussed
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andreas Pflug||Date: 2006-08-29 15:58:29|
|Subject: Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures|
|Previous:||From: Bernd Helmle||Date: 2006-08-29 15:53:03|
|Subject: Re: Updatable views|