Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures
Date: 2006-08-29 15:55:25
Message-ID: 44F4636D.5000905@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> My objection here is basically that this proposal passed on the
>>> assumption that it would be very nearly zero effort to make it happen.
>>>
>
>
>> Kicking out autovacuum as default is a disaster, it took far too long to
>> get in the backend already (wasn't it planned for 8.0?).
>>
>
> If it's so "disastrous" to not have it, why wasn't it even proposed
> until two weeks after feature freeze?
To me, this proposal was just too obvious, for reasons already discussed
earlier.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2006-08-29 15:58:29 Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2006-08-29 15:53:03 Re: Updatable views