Re: A counter productive conversation about search.

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A counter productive conversation about search.
Date: 2006-08-29 14:28:05
Message-ID: 44F44EF5.3090102@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


>> Other options include lucene, and rolling our own.
>
> Is Lucene capable of handling the size of our index? This has always

I am going to say, "yes" without any actual knowledge because of Lucene
but that is because I am putting more trust in the fact that it is an
Apache project then anything. I will check.

> been the problem we've had with other projects like MnogoSearch. They
> work well until you load them up with the archives after which they
> simply can't cope without ridiculous amounts of hardware.
>
>> Rolling our own really wouldn't be that hard "if" we can create a
>> reasonably smart web page grabber. We have all the tools
>> (tsearch2 and
>> pg_pgtrm) to easily do the searches.
>>
>> So is anyone up for helping develop a page grabber?
>
> We have one - it builds the static version of the main site by spidering
> it hourly.

Should we look at that then?

>
> Regards, Dave.
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ned Lilly 2006-08-29 14:30:56 Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-29 14:25:53 Re: Search out of sync