Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> Support of PGCluster-I, which we're discussing here, is being dropped
> in favor of the shared-disk PGCluster-II which was demonstrated at the
> anniversary conference. IIRC, PGCluster-I does use command-based
> replication but is merged into the parser in such a way as to make it
> work quite well--unlike the man-in-the-middle approach taken by
> pgpool.
Didn't Atsushi Mitani say he wanted to continue PgCluster-I? As they
serve quite different needs that would make sense.
Regards
Markus