| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] COPY view |
| Date: | 2006-08-23 12:08:24 |
| Message-ID: | 44EC4538.4040800@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> At the moment, with the online-index and updatable-views patches both
> pretty seriously broken, and no sign that the bitmap-index people are
> awake at all, I might take it on myself to fix this one instead of those
> others. But is that what I should be spending my time on in the waning
> days of the 8.2 freeze cycle? Speak now or hold your peace.
>
>
>
Personally, I would say that this is less important than updatable views
but more than online indexes. If it could be fixed just for the view
case in a day or so then I think it's worth it.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2006-08-23 12:11:24 | Re: Question about (lazy) vacuum |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2006-08-23 12:08:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Use of backslash in tsearch2 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-23 12:24:55 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY view |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2006-08-23 12:08:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Use of backslash in tsearch2 |