| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |
| Date: | 2006-08-17 16:37:19 |
| Message-ID: | 44E49B3F.9010004@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Then why bother with two different lists?
>
> If developers need to be on both list (which I beleive they do), and the
> focus of both lists is developers, then why not just remove one of them
> and get rid of the problem?
I wouldn't argue with that. It would be at least equally good from my
perspective, and maybe slightly better.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-08-17 16:40:14 | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-08-17 16:35:47 | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2006-08-17 16:40:29 | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-17 16:30:34 | Re: [HACKERS] selecting large result sets in psql using |