Re: 8.2 features status

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-11 14:31:23
Message-ID: 44DC94BB.6090300@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway napsal(a):

> However, is there a reason to use Trac beyond the fact that it is
> already setup? ISTM we only need a wiki, and don't need the other
> features of Trac, such as the bug tracker.

I do not agree. How you determine what release fixes the bug now? We
have web page and mailing list for bug reporting but there is not any
relation between bug, patch and release(s). I think bug tracking is
necessary if we want move forward.

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-08-11 14:55:55 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2006-08-11 13:14:47 Re: Bison Version