Re: 8.2 features status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-11 01:16:14
Message-ID: 44DBDA5E.4010205@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 17:33 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> No, like the rest of the world, Trac has moved on from CVS ;)
>
> There is CVSTrac (www.cvstrac.org), which actually predates Trac.
>
> However, is there a reason to use Trac beyond the fact that it is
> already setup? ISTM we only need a wiki, and don't need the other
> features of Trac, such as the bug tracker.

Well that is certainly the question but the bug tracker could easily
turn into a todo list as well. It is a very powerful tool that is
relatively flexible.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> -Neil
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message andrew 2006-08-11 02:04:10 Re: Buildfarm failure on ecpg/test/pgtypeslib
Previous Message Neil Conway 2006-08-11 00:49:53 Re: 8.2 features status