| From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: proposal for PL packages for 8.3. |
| Date: | 2006-08-09 14:01:13 |
| Message-ID: | 44D9EAA9.6080407@archonet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Richard Huxton wrote:
>
> Packaging
> I'd guess we'd need a pg_package and pg_package_items system tables. We
> could track:
> - package name (different from schema)
> - version number
> - install/uninstall functions
> - start-session/end-session functions
> - dependencies (is pg_depend enough)
> pg_package_items
> - schema-name
> - variables, functions, tables, views etc
While I'm thinking of it:
pg_dump needs to either dump a package as a complete package, or be able
to replace them with an instruction to import the relevant package
(where there is no associated data, just functions).
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-09 14:04:48 | Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-09 13:54:28 | Re: Casts |