Re: PostgreSQL scalability on Sun UltraSparc T1

From: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
To: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL scalability on Sun UltraSparc T1
Date: 2006-08-07 13:18:27
Message-ID: 44D73DA3.7080701@logix-tt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi, Arjen,

Arjen van der Meijden wrote:

> It was the 8core version with 16GB memory... but actually that's just
> overkill, the active portions of the database easily fits in 8GB and a
> test on another machine with just 2GB didn't even show that much
> improvements when going to 7GB (6x1G, 2x 512M), it was mostly in the
> range of 10% improvement or less.

I'd be interested in the commit_siblings and commit_delay settings,
tuning them could give a high increase on throughput for highly
concurrent insert/update workloads, at the cost of latency (and thus
worse results for low concurrency situations).

Different fsync method settings can also make a difference (I presume
that syncing was enabled).

HTH,
Markus

--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schaber 2006-08-07 13:32:39 Re: sub select performance due to seq scans
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-07 12:52:17 Re: High Context-Switches on Linux 8.1.4 Server