Re: Intermittent "make check" failures on hyena

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Intermittent "make check" failures on hyena
Date: 2006-08-06 21:29:12
Message-ID: 44D65F28.8070004@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>I see one occurrence in the 8.1 branch on hyena, but the failure
>probability seems to have jumped way up in HEAD since we put in the
>C-coded pg_regress. This lends weight to the idea that it's a
>timing-related issue, because pg_regress.c is presumably much faster
>at forking off a parallel gang of psqls than the shell script was;
>and it's hard to see what else about the pg_regress change could be
>affecting the psqls' ability to connect once forked.
>
>We probably need to get some Solaris experts involved in diagnosing
>what's happening. Judging by the buildfarm results you should be able
>to replicate it fairly easily by doing "make installcheck-parallel"
>repeatedly.
>
>
>
>

I will refer this to those experts - my Solaris-fu is a tad rusty these
days.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Agent M 2006-08-06 21:49:45 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2006-08-06 19:50:21 Re: problem with volatile functions in subselects ?