| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Date: | 2006-08-05 02:19:28 |
| Message-ID: | 44D40030.7010508@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I tend to agree --- I don't see much value in trying to institute a
> formalized process. We have not had that many cases where lack of
> communication was a problem.
How do you know? Seriously... this comes up at least twice a year :).
There is probably a basis for it.
As I was saying on #postgresql, the current system works well for a
small group of developers. I don't think there is any arguing that.
However, there is a larger group out there, that would likely be willing
to contribute but we are a bit of a black box, or perhaps we are too
transparent?? I am not sure which.
Frankly, I don't care if we ever get a bug tracker or use trac. However
a more formalized communication process is sorely needed IMHO.
I am actually hoping that jabber.postgresql.org would help that in the
long run.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-05 02:30:26 | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-08-05 02:17:21 | Re: 8.2 features status |