From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
Date: | 2006-07-31 21:46:45 |
Message-ID: | 44CE7A45.70400@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:19:43PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>>>> The good news is that from a memory and perfomance standpoint, my simple
>>>> test now shows us outperforming mysql:
>>> Sweet ;-)
>> I love this team. Kudos!
>
> So now it's MySQL users' turn to say, "Sure, but speed isn't
> everything...." :-)
"Sure, but speed isn't everything... We can accept 02/31/2006 as a valid
date. Let's see PostgreSQL do that!"
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-07-31 22:29:35 | Suggested changes to Tutorial |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-07-31 20:44:56 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-07-31 22:04:42 | Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-31 21:46:12 | Re: DTrace enabled build fails |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-07-31 22:26:30 | Forcing current WAL file to be archived |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-07-31 20:44:56 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |