Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL

From: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Date: 2006-07-24 00:52:12
Message-ID: 44C419BC.1050503@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:

>Yeah, those seem plausible, although the hold time for
>CheckpointStartLock seems awfully high --- about 20 msec
>per transaction. Are you using a nonzero commit_delay?
>
>
>
>
I didn't change commit_delay which defaults to zero.

Regards,
-Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Lor 2006-07-24 01:00:31 Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2006-07-24 00:35:37 Re: On-disk bitmap index patch

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-24 01:29:39 Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-23 23:52:16 Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL