| From: | Lukas Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: monolithic distro |
| Date: | 2006-07-14 06:52:48 |
| Message-ID: | 44B73F40.1090609@pooteeweet.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Lukas Smith wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>>> whereas PostgreSQL is continuously complaing that
>>> MySQL is inferior yet way more popular. Maybe MySQL's popularity is not
>>> even PostgreSQL's goal, but I am sure a bit more would be welcome.
>>
>> Does MySQL have a monolithic distribution?
>
> Well obviously MySQL is missing alot of functionality that you will not
> get in any version of MySQL though.
>
> However it comes with replication, fulltext indexes out of the box. They
> currently only have a single stored procedure language (partial SQL:2003
> implementation).
Oh and they also ship a federated (AFAIK their dblink answer) along with
several other storage engines for various specific tasks.
regards,
Lukas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-07-14 07:48:16 | Re: Fwd: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Previous Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2006-07-14 06:50:31 | ShmemAlloc() alignment patch |