| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Date: | 2006-07-14 02:04:32 |
| Message-ID: | 44B6FBB0.4010800@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>>
>>> Second, its assuming that Thomas, or any other pl/java developer,
>>> *isn't* going to watching for any changes to the API fairly closely,
>>> considering they know it does happen, and, therefore, won't make a
>>> change to their development code to accommodate that when the time
>>> comes ...
>>>
>> As we have explained before, there really isn't an API in any
>> meaningful sense. Thomas will undoubtedly be vigilant, but the real
>> danger is that something non-obvious will change and break stuff.
>
> But, as Tom has already explained, *he's* not going to make changes
> pl/java if its committed ... how many will even have java (or gcj) to
> even test it to see if its broken?
>
Quite so. That's why buildfarm for pl/java will be important when I can
get it done.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-07-14 02:06:23 | include compile problems |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-07-14 01:52:46 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |