| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Date: | 2006-07-13 17:02:29 |
| Message-ID: | 44B67CA5.80801@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> I'm being objective here, and PL/J is not nearly as stable or
>> well-maintained... that means a lot to me or to anyone who looks at
>> using a Java PL.
> Doesn't EDB sponsor pl/java ? I would think that might make you somewhat
> subjective ?
Dave,
I don't think so in this situation. It is in EDB's best interest to
sponsor the product that works best for them. Right now (maybe not for
everyone) that is clearly pl/java.
> That being said, pl-j is not as mature as pl/java, however I don't
> believe that is a valid reason for exclusion.
> Open source projects by their nature gain maturity by exposure.
It is a valid reason if it is going to be in core.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-07-13 17:05:53 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-13 17:02:16 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |