| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Date: | 2006-07-13 04:07:57 |
| Message-ID: | 44B5C71D.80703@tada.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> writes:
>
>> Why to you persist talking about licensing issues with PL/Java? There are none. PL/Java
>> builds and runs just fine with gcj and the above statement is completely false.
>>
>
> Um ... if you use it with gcj, there may or may not be any licensing
> problems (please recall we are trying to be a BSD-only project, not a
> BSD-and-LGPL project),
You have no problems using gcc, gnu-make, etc. What's the difference?
> but what of people who use some other JVM?
> It's not like gcj works for everyone yet.
>
>
What of them? If they decide to use another JVM, well, then let them. I
don't see where that becomes a licensing problem from PostgreSQL.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-07-13 04:08:45 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-13 04:03:59 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |