| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Date: | 2006-07-13 03:50:50 |
| Message-ID: | 44B5C31A.7010807@tada.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> ... equal claim to inclusion
> in core. Perhaps more, because it gives us an extra layer of insulation
> from JVM licensing questions.
>
Tom,
Why to you persist talking about licensing issues with PL/Java? There are none. PL/Java
builds and runs just fine with gcj and the above statement is completely false.
Dave,
What JVM requirements does PL/J currently have? What license implications are imposed by the
components that it depends upon?
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-07-13 03:56:12 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-07-13 03:42:21 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |