Re: More nuclear options

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More nuclear options
Date: 2006-07-11 16:55:12
Message-ID: 44B3D7F0.10305@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert,

> To be honest I don't know why people are against throwing the code on
> pgfoundry with a hefty readme saying that the code is unmaintained and what
> it's build status is on various versions

... because we don't want to litter pgFoundry with dead, broken projects
which nobody uses and which confuse users and crowd the namespace.
Quality > quantity.

In a year nobody has spoken up for those specific projects. Who's
going to maintain them? Who's going to use them?

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-07-11 16:55:46 Restartable Recovery
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-07-11 16:50:38 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze