Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: debian package splitting: pgagent should be

From: Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: PgAdmin Hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: debian package splitting: pgagent should be
Date: 2006-07-07 13:36:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Dave Page wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr] 
>>Sent: 06 July 2006 17:59
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: PgAdmin Hackers
>>Subject: debian package splitting: pgagent should be 
>>distributed separately
>>Hi Dave,
>>as you know, I'm about to split the debian package so that pgagent can
>>be installed separately from pgAdmin III on a server for example.
>>I'm asking to myself if it would not be a good thing to distribute it
>>separately upstream. I mean, something like adminpacks that would live
>>its life in itself and not as a part of pgAdmin III.
>>What do you think about it ?
> Not entirely sure. Maybe we need a ./configure switch to build just pgAgent (or any other /xtra/ part)?

Ok, it would help Florian to disable the build...
./configure --disable-pgagent.

Concerning my particular case it's not that important. The debian 
packaging system is able to generate multiple "binary packages" from one 
"source package". It's just a question of packaging.

> I'll ask some of the guys here what they think.

Ok, let us know and a big hello to everybody around ;)


In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: svnDate: 2006-07-09 05:30:49
Subject: SVN Commit by dpage: r5249 - in trunk/pgadmin3/src: frm include main
Previous:From: Florian G. PflugDate: 2006-07-07 13:12:42
Subject: Re: Bugs created by new UI / Introduction of

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group