| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Long term database archival |
| Date: | 2006-07-07 00:25:38 |
| Message-ID: | 44ADAA02.4030309@cox.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Agent M wrote:
> Will postgresql be a viable database in 20 years? Will SQL be used
> anywhere in 20 years? Are you sure 20 years is your ideal backup duration?
SQL was used 20 years ago, why not 20 years from now?
I can't see needing data from 10 years ago, but you never know.
Thank $DEITY for microfilm; otherwise, we'd not know a whole lot
about what happened 150 years ago.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEraoCS9HxQb37XmcRAnUSAKCrq1JOjb4lqmesi31Ko8a9N3MjxgCg7X9B
1gl+H5TMia4PE6mFtSbAApE=
=UtVq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Agent M | 2006-07-07 00:46:15 | Re: Long term database archival |
| Previous Message | Richard Broersma Jr | 2006-07-07 00:22:32 | Re: Long term database archival |