| From: | Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Guyver <kenevel(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Binary tx format for an array? |
| Date: | 2006-06-23 12:00:01 |
| Message-ID: | 449BD7C1.3050501@logix-tt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi, Dave,
Dave Cramer wrote:
> I'm curious. Are you attempting to implement the binary protocol for the
> jdbc driver ?
>
> If so, how are you dealing with date types which are either 64 bit or
> floating point.
>
> Have you done any testing to see if it is actually faster ?
>
> There's certainly no question with timestamp/date parsing, others may be
> questionable .
At least for PostGIS (which uses a hexed representation for text
protocol currently), I expect the data volume to be exactly 50% for binary.
Bytea and blobs may be similar.
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Guyver | 2006-06-23 12:47:11 | Re: Binary tx format for an array? |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2006-06-23 11:44:15 | Re: Binary tx format for an array? |