Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: mischa(at)ca(dot)sophos(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
Date: 2006-06-13 22:55:32
Message-ID: 448F4264.5030109@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> Initially shared_buffers were set to 1000 (8MB).
> Then, we moved all apps but the database server off the box.
>
> Raised shared_buffers to 2000 (16MB).
> Modest improvement in some frequent repeated queries.
>
> Raised shared_buffers to 16000 (128MB).
> DB server dropped to a CRAWL.

Versions below 8.1 normally don't do well with high shared_buffers. 8.1
would do much better. If you dropped that to more like 6k you would
probably continue to see increase over 2k.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mischa Sandberg 2006-06-13 23:04:58 Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-06-13 22:54:23 Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4