Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650) 4-th try

From: Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Ludek Finstrle <luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650) 4-th try
Date: 2006-06-13 14:12:58
Message-ID: 448EC7EA.1080405@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Ludek Finstrle wrote:
>
> I make patch againist CVS after yours huge commit. What's your opinion?
>

Is the second parameter of snprintf_add needed ?
Aren't the parameter values always strlen(the first parameter) ?

Is snprintf_len needed instead of snprintf ?
Though the current code ignores snprintf errors, it's simply
my negligence..

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message postgresql.org 2006-06-13 19:28:34 float8 auto truncation issue in ODBC v. PGSQL
Previous Message Campbell, Greg 2006-06-13 14:06:04 Re: [compgeneral] I cant get the description or default valueof a field