Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Leigh Dyer <leigh(at)eclinic(dot)com(dot)au>, Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Date: 2006-06-13 13:15:06
Message-ID: 448EBA5A.8020503@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
>
> In which case, why was 64-bit such a big deal?
>

We had this discussion with 16/32 bit too, back in those 286/386 times...
Not too many 16bit apps left now :-)

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J. Andrew Rogers 2006-06-13 13:46:10 Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Previous Message Sven Geisler 2006-06-13 12:52:02 Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?