Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?

From: Nis Jorgensen <nis(at)superlativ(dot)dk>
To: "J(dot) Andrew Rogers" <jrogers(at)neopolitan(dot)com>
Cc: "Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail))" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Date: 2006-06-13 08:40:20
Message-ID: 448E79F4.1060303@superlativ.dk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

J. Andrew Rogers wrote:

> We have been using PostgreSQL on Opteron servers almost since the
> Opteron was first released, running both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of
> Linux. Both 32-bit and 64-bit versions have been bulletproof for us,
> with the usual stability I've become accustomed to with both PostgreSQL
> and Linux. We have been running nothing but 64-bit versions on
> mission-critical systems for the last year with zero problems.
>
> The short story is that for us 64-bit PostgreSQL on Opterons is
> typically something like 20% faster than 32-bit on the same, and *much*
> faster than P4 Xeon systems they nominally compete with.

Since you sound like you have done extensive testing:

Do you have any data regarding whether to enable hyperthreading or not?
I realize that this may be highly dependant on the OS, application and
number of CPUs, but I would be interested in hearing your
recommendations (or others').

/Nis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sven Geisler 2006-06-13 09:04:32 Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Previous Message Ruben Rubio Rey 2006-06-13 08:17:08 Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved?