| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail))" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? |
| Date: | 2006-06-13 01:15:29 |
| Message-ID: | 448E11B1.20309@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> Empirically... postgresql built for 64 bits is marginally slower than
> that built
> for a 32 bit api on sparc. None of my customers have found 64 bit x86
> systems to be suitable for production use, yet, so I've not tested on any
> of those architectures.
Really? All of our customers are migrating to Opteron and I have many
that have been using Opteron for over 12 months happily.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2006-06-13 01:29:05 | Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? |
| Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2006-06-13 00:29:33 | Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? |