Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Encrypted indexes over encrypted data

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Danylo Hlynskyi <abcz2(dot)uprola(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Encrypted indexes over encrypted data
Date: 2018-08-09 12:05:05
Message-ID: 44884492-CFA0-48B8-85EA-F9B38778FD27@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On August 9, 2018 5:30:26 PM GMT+05:30, Danylo Hlynskyi <abcz2(dot)uprola(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> ?Is it hard to implement soluition 2?

Yes.

To the point that I'm fairly certain that an implementation would be considered to costly to maintain (vs benefit) of proposed.

Andres

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-08-09 12:29:08 remove ancient pre-dlopen dynloader code
Previous Message Danylo Hlynskyi 2018-08-09 12:00:26 [FEATURE REQUEST] Encrypted indexes over encrypted data